The Golden Rule in Leadership… NOT

May 1, 2012 1 Comment

Have you ever heard the expression ‘if you only have a hammer everything looks like a nail’?  I love to use this expression when it comes to management styles.  A hard-driving style can be very, very effective… if it is used appropriately and in a situation that calls for that style and approach.  Your “coaching” style (see Goleman, “Leadership that Gets Results”) can be very, very effective… if it is used appropriately and within a situation that calls for that style and approach.  One size does not fit all.  And, the best leaders know this and are able to adapt their style to the situation, the person, and the person-situation combination.  There are many instruments you can use to get a view of your style as a leader.  We use the DISC as one tool to identify a leadership style.  Then, we focus on how to adapt your style to increase your effectiveness as a leader.

Leaders who adapt their style:

  • identify individual styles
  • acknowledge differences
  • tailor their approach

Identify individual styles:  The most effective leaders have a high level of self-awareness.  You know your style.  You know your tendencies in specific situations.  You know the way you like to work, your strengths, and when your strengths become your weaknesses.  Great leaders also have a high level of awareness of others.  You know the styles and preferences of those around you and you pay attention to cues that help you determine how others are going to respond.  Use any model you choose, but know well your tendencies and how your style interacts with other styles.  It is how you maximize impact.

Acknowledge differences:  It is critical that you acknowledge differences, accepting the fact that there are many styles that are effective in different situations.  Only the most arrogant (and disillusioned) believe their style is best all the time.  The Golden Rule, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”… this commonly held belief might be useful in social situations, but in leadership not so much!  You must know others around you and the biggest mistake you can make is to assume they all want to be rewarded, recognized, and motivated just like you do!  Be aware of your style and how it complements and conflicts with other styles.  Know it and plan for it.

Tailor their approach:  If you know your style, know the style of those around you, and can honestly acknowledge different styles you are in a great position to tailor your approach to maximize effectiveness.  It is important to know how others are motivated and tailor your approach to inspiring and motivating the desired behavior.  You may be a driver who only needs a carrot on the other side of the wall.  However, your direct report may need coaxing, motivation that includes the ‘why?’ or specs on how high the wall is before they are willing to scale the wall with you.  The more tools you have in your leadership toolkit, the more likely you are to be effective in motivating many.

Filed under coaching, Leadership, Leadership Development, Management development Tagged with , , , , ,

Hold People Accountable

April 28, 2012 Leave a comment

In our last webinar we focused on setting the priorities and planning for accomplishment.  In this 3rd webinar we focus on good practices for holding people accountable.  We read the HBR article “Who’s Got the Monkey?” by William Onchen, Jr., and Donald Wass.  The concept in the article was the backdrop for holding people accountable for the right things while avoiding taking all of the accountability on yourself. It is a great read.  Research completed by Partner in Leadership reported that 80% of leaders feel less than adequate when asked to evaluate their success in this area.  Clearly, it is a great place to focus.

Our three premise statements for a leader who effectively holds people accountable are:

  1. Align expectations
  2. Consistently follow-up
  3. Create ownership
Align expectations:  Here is the best news about aligning expectations — if you are outrageously clear about the expectations, and the employee understands, and you agree upon checkpoints… holding people accountable becomes the simplest part of the equation!  If your employee knows what you are looking for and when you are going to look, then your task is simply to ask on-time!  No arguments.  No confusion.  Here is the bad news about aligning expectations — not many leaders are strong in this area.  Three things you can do to improve your skills in this area.  First, before you set the expectations with your employees consider the situation from their perspective.  Consider what’s in it for them, what will be easy, what will be difficult.  Think it through before you begin then conversation.  Second, have the conversation.  Notice I did not say “tell them the expectations”.  I said have the conversation; a two-way dialogue.  Involve the employee in the setting of clear expectations.  Finally, restate.  It seems so simple, but it happens so infrequently.  After you have had your conversation and believe you have reached agreement, simply restate or better yet have the employee restate.  If you follow these simple steps, you can guarantee alignment.
Consistently follow-up:  Do you have routines that help you follow-up consistently?  Do you use the same routines for all employees, both high-performing and struggling?  There is no magic bullet here.  To be effective at follow-up you need to establish routines or cues for  yourself to follow-up at designated times — use your calendar, use a follow-up email, ask your employee to follow-up (that means you probably have to set a calendar reminder to remember that you asked your employee to follow-up!).  Whatever you do, be consistent.  And, think about the employee — a struggling employee may need to follow-up after baby steps while the high-performer can clearly be monitored differently.
Create ownership:  In the book, “The Oz Principle” (Connors, Hickman, and Smith) talk about the importance of the ‘line’ when it comes to accountability.  Below the line there are statements that clearly reflect a lack of accountability — “I don’t remember you asking me that”, “I could have accomplished it but…”, “It is really not my fault.”  Recognize these statements as ‘below the line’, lacking accountability and address directly.  You may have to go back to the first step of Align Expectations.  ”Above the line” statements reflect clear accountability on the employee’s part.  Statements such as ‘I have a recommendation’, “Let me tell you how we are going to get this done.”  It is much easier to be successful with employees who stay ‘above the line’.  Follow these steps and make it much more likely!

Filed under coaching, Leadership, Leadership Development, Management development Tagged with , , , , ,

Plan priorities

April 21, 2012 2 Comments

To be a successful leader you  obviously must accomplish things, deliver on expected results, and consistently build on past successes.  There are so many things to do — your workday can be consumed by the ‘tyranny of the urgent’ if we are not careful.  You can turn around and realize the day or week is over and you don’t have a lot of measurable accomplishments to claim.  Are you any closer to your goals?  You know you worked hard, but what do you have to show for it?

In this 2nd of our 12 webinar series we focused on planning priorities.  Name the priorities, communicate them, and then create a solid plan for how you and your team will accomplish.  The key is to name the priorities and then stick to them.  Easier said than done.

Our three key premise statements for leaders who plan priorities are:

  1. Set clear stretch goals
  2. Focus on the big rocks
  3. Do, delegate, or dump

Set clear stretch goals:  Read the article “Demand Better Results – And Get Them” by Robert H. Schaffer and you will get a great view of how most managers do NOT stretch team members enough.  The article emphasizes that a manager typically gets what he or she asks for — it’s the Hawthorne Effect of leadership!  But, it is not enough to set the stretch goals.  After you have set the goals you must communicate effectively and with great clarity.  The minimum expectations need to be clear, specific, and measurable.  Then, you must monitor progress, but give clear ownership to a team member.  It is only possible to monitor the project effectively if you have first worked through a plan of steps to take, how progress will be measured, and then assign one person ownership.  Set clear stretch goals first.  Then, your job is to keep the team and yourself focused on those goals.

Focus on the big rocks:  We borrowed a classic concept from Steven Covey here — focus on the big rocks.  There are fabulous, simple videos available on You Tube that explain the concept.  Basically, everyone has 24-hours in a day and we each have a few important things to do each day and then a whole bunch of other things that we could do.  We all fill every 24-hour time period somehow, right?  If you simply fill your day with activities, you end the day with a full day, but did you accomplish what you needed to accomplish?  Covey uses the metaphor of a jar with sand and big rocks.  Your goal is to fill your jar, but you must include all of the big rocks (priorities) and all of the sand (the other ‘stuff’ of your day).  If you try to put all of the ‘sand’ in first, it is not likely that you will be able to fit-in all of the big rocks (your priorities).  Instead, put your ‘big rocks’ in first.  Then, the sand can fill in all around the big rocks.  It is the same thing with your day, your week, and your year.  We came up with a saying to help us remember how to accomplish the ‘big rocks’ first each day — “Your big rocks require time blocks!”

Do, Delegate, or Dump:  You have set  your clear stretch goals and you have your team focused on the big rocks.  You know what the steps are to achieving the most important things each day.  But, do YOU have time to DO it all?  Clearly not.  DO:  Ask yourself — what is on our list of priorities that I, and only I, must do?  DELEGATE:  What things on the priority list are something that I can delegate to someone on the team?  Is there someone who is already capable of doing a task?  Or, is there someone on the team who could be taught to complete one of the tasks?  Sure, it takes more time upfront, but you are developing someone on your team and you are freeing time for you priorities.  DUMP:  Finally, are there tasks on the list that really don’t need to be done?  Can you ‘dump’ any of the tasks without significant pain to your priorities?  Do, Delegate, or Dump and you have your planned effectively mapped!

Filed under coaching, Leadership, Leadership Development, Management development Tagged with , , ,

Lead like a leader

April 14, 2012 Leave a comment

“Lead Like a Leader” was the first of our twelve leadership development webinars.  We had participants read the article “Becoming the Boss” by Linda Hill.  The article provides a perspective on the differences in being a successful individual contributor and then getting to that ‘manager’ role.  It is important that new managers understand what is NOT true about their new role.

We shared three premise statements that define the gist of being a leader.

Leaders who lead like leaders:

  1. Ask more than tell
  2. Teach and Trust to Fish
  3. Respect differences

Ask more than tell:  Obviously, the whole idea behind this premise statement is asking questions rather than being ‘the answer man’.  It is a common misconception that being the manager means having all of the answers and playing the parent role with your director reports.  (Think “Mother knows best”.)  On the contrary, the best managers spend much more time asking questions — they ask questions to understand the perspective of others, determine where another person is coming from, and getting the best ideas there are from the collective group.  It is a simple premise statement to understand, but as we all know, very few (and I mean very few) managers are natural listeners!

Teach and trust to fish:  We added a twist to the ‘teach ‘em to fish’ proverb in this premise statement.  We all know that if we take the time to TEACH someone to do something we are eventually freed-up to do more and better things; we have also developed the skills of another.  Everyone wins.  It was important to us that we add the ‘TRUST” after you have taught.  We don’t mean that you don’t monitor or ask about progress, we simply advise that you teach someone how to do something and then give them space enough to perform.  Every manager needs to find the balance of monitor versus micro-manage.

Respect differences:  This is another no-brainer that we took to a different level.  Of course you respect the differences in your work group.  We spend considerable time talking about the advantages and disadvantages of hiring all ‘mini-me’ employees.  Most managers are naturally inclined to hire people just like them — you understand where they are coming from, you understand what buttons to push, and you appreciate in them what you like in yourself.  However, consider the lost diversity of thought.  Consider the good ideas that will never occur to someone with a perspective that is similar to yours.  Consider the tasks that will never get done because all of you dislike the same tasks.  It takes all kinds.  The best managers know that and put up with the pain of having to get to know someone who is different!

Filed under coaching, Leadership, Leadership Development, Management development, Uncategorized Tagged with , , , ,

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 126 other followers

%d bloggers like this: